[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:15:43 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Johannes Thumshirn <morbidrsa@...il.com>,
Doug Thompson <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC, mpc85xx: fix build warning
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 08:43:57PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> another way might be:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c b/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
> index b7139c1..968c0c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
> @@ -1244,7 +1244,9 @@ static struct platform_driver * const drivers[] = {
> static int __init mpc85xx_mc_init(void)
> {
> int res = 0;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_SOC_BOOKE
> u32 pvr = 0;
> +#endif
Nah, this is the ugliest of them all. We want less ifdeffery, not more.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists