linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 5/5] rtc: max77686: move initialisation of rtc regmap, irq chip locally

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:43:02 +0530
From:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	<lee.jones@...aro.org>, <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	<javier@....samsung.com>
CC:	<cw00.choi@...sung.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 5/5] rtc: max77686: move initialisation of rtc regmap,
 irq chip locally


On Thursday 04 February 2016 02:38 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04.02.2016 15:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 04.02.2016 11:03, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>> 3. Can you try locally to not use devm_regmap_init_i2c() and just use
>>> the regmap_init_i2c() and proper removal of this from error path and
>>> remove callback?
>> I'll try to find some time for that. Maybe tomorrow.
> regmap_init_i2c does not help. However helps commenting out the:
> 	regmap_del_irq_chip(info->rtc_irq, info->rtc_irq_data);
> from remove() callback.
>
>

Thanks for debugging.  I do not see anything on regmap_del_irq_chip() 
which can be suspected. Is this because of sharing interrupt between mfd 
and rtc driver?

What is your suggestion here?  Should we avoid this inside RTC driver 
(creating this in mfd) and pass this information to the rtc driver using 
customized platform driver?