linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 5/5] rtc: max77686: move initialisation of rtc regmap, irq chip locally

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56B38116.2010302@osg.samsung.com>
Date:	Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:49:26 -0300
From:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	lee.jones@...aro.org, alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com
Cc:	cw00.choi@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 5/5] rtc: max77686: move initialisation of rtc regmap,
 irq chip locally

Hello Laxman,

On 02/03/2016 11:50 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:

[snip]

>>>>
>>> Looks good and works properly (RTC, unbind/rebind, wakealarm again)
>>> but... after applying this patch the device cannot suspend to RAM after
>>> unbind/rebind.
>>>
>>> Reproduce path, after booting:
>>> $ echo max77686-rtc > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/max77686-rtc/unbind
>>> $ echo max77686-rtc > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/max77686-rtc/bind
>>> $ rtcwake -d rtc2 -m mem -s 5 -v
>>> (or instead of rtcwake: echo mem > /sys/power/state)
>>
>
> Can you please also try to test in your setup which have MAX77802?
> On this, we do not create i2c client and do regmap_init_i2c. So may be it helps on narrow down the issue.
>

Sorry for the delay but I was busy with others tasks. I've tested it
on an Exynos5800 Peach Pi (which has a max77802) and I've the same
issue. The system doesn't suspend after the max77802-rc unbind.

As Krzysztof narrowed down, commenting the regmap_del_irq_chip() call
in the .remove callback makes it to not fail again.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America