linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the aio tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:50:56 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Linux-Next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the aio tree

On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 08:41:42AM -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:19:59PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Benjamin,
> > 
> > On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:03:39 +0100 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> > > <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > > >> Background: new aio code is adding __get_user() calls referencing 64
> > > >> bit quantities (__u64 and __s64).  
> > > >
> > > > There's lots more architectures which do not support 64-bit get_user()
> > > > _or_ __get_user(): avr32, blackfin, metag for example, and m68k which
> > > > has this interesting thing "/* case 8: disabled because gcc-4.1 has a
> > > > broken typeof \" in its *get_user() implementation.  
> > > 
> > > And if you enable it again, you get lots of "warning: cast to pointer from
> > > integer of different size", like you mentioned.
> > 
> > Any thoughts?  I am still using the version of tha aio tree from
> > next-20160111.
> 
> I am still convinced that this is an architecture issue.  Given that 64 bit 
> values work in the *get_user implementations on other architectures, I see 
> no reason there should need to be a workaround for this in common code.

So you're happy to break x86-32 then...

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.