linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the aio tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160204140822.GB16315@kvack.org>
Date:	Thu, 4 Feb 2016 09:08:22 -0500
From:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Linux-Next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the aio tree

On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:50:56PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > I am still convinced that this is an architecture issue.  Given that 64 bit 
> > values work in the *get_user implementations on other architectures, I see 
> > no reason there should need to be a workaround for this in common code.
> 
> So you're happy to break x86-32 then...

x86-32 works fine.

		-ben
-- 
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."