linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] net: ethernet: support "fixed-link" DT node on nb8800 driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 05 Feb 2016 15:56:29 +0100
From:	Sebastian Frias <sf84@...oste.net>
To:	Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>
CC:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: ethernet: support "fixed-link" DT node on nb8800
 driver

On 02/05/2016 03:34 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Sebastian Frias <sf84@...oste.net> writes:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Frias <sf84@...oste.net>
>
> Please change the subject to something like "net: ethernet: nb8800:
> support fixed-link DT node" and add a comment body.

The subject is pretty explicit for such a simple patch, what else could 
I add that wouldn't be unnecessary chat?

>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c
>> index ecc4a33..e1fb071 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c
>> @@ -1460,7 +1460,19 @@ static int nb8800_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   		goto err_disable_clk;
>>   	}
>>
>> -	priv->phy_node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "phy-handle", 0);
>> +	if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(pdev->dev.of_node)) {
>> +		ret = of_phy_register_fixed_link(pdev->dev.of_node);
>> +		if (ret < 0) {
>> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "bad fixed-link spec\n");
>> +			goto err_free_bus;
>> +		}
>> +		priv->phy_node = of_node_get(pdev->dev.of_node);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (!priv->phy_node)
>> +		priv->phy_node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node,
>> +						  "phy-handle", 0);
>> +
>>   	if (!priv->phy_node) {
>>   		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no PHY specified\n");
>>   		ret = -ENODEV;
>> --
>> 2.1.4
>