[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56B4B81D.3000108@laposte.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 15:56:29 +0100
From: Sebastian Frias <sf84@...oste.net>
To: Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: ethernet: support "fixed-link" DT node on nb8800
driver
On 02/05/2016 03:34 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Sebastian Frias <sf84@...oste.net> writes:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Frias <sf84@...oste.net>
>
> Please change the subject to something like "net: ethernet: nb8800:
> support fixed-link DT node" and add a comment body.
The subject is pretty explicit for such a simple patch, what else could
I add that wouldn't be unnecessary chat?
>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c
>> index ecc4a33..e1fb071 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c
>> @@ -1460,7 +1460,19 @@ static int nb8800_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> goto err_disable_clk;
>> }
>>
>> - priv->phy_node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "phy-handle", 0);
>> + if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(pdev->dev.of_node)) {
>> + ret = of_phy_register_fixed_link(pdev->dev.of_node);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "bad fixed-link spec\n");
>> + goto err_free_bus;
>> + }
>> + priv->phy_node = of_node_get(pdev->dev.of_node);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!priv->phy_node)
>> + priv->phy_node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node,
>> + "phy-handle", 0);
>> +
>> if (!priv->phy_node) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no PHY specified\n");
>> ret = -ENODEV;
>> --
>> 2.1.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists