linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] usb: gadget: u_ether: Add workqueue as bottom half handler for rx data path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160208232004.GC19380@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:20:04 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	Badhri Jagan Sridharan <Badhri@...gle.com>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
	Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@...ic.nl>,
	Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@...sung.com>,
	Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] usb: gadget: u_ether: Add workqueue as bottom half
 handler for rx data path

On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 02:07:02AM +0530, Amit Pundir wrote:
> Please ignore this one too. I should have build tested these patches
> individually and not in particular series. I'll resend this patch.

Send them in a numbered series so we know what order they have to be
applied in.

And I always ignore RFC patches, if you can't be confident enough in
submitting it for inclusion, why should we care?  :)

You have of course tested these, right?

thanks,

greg k-h