linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] usb: gadget: u_ether: Add workqueue as bottom half handler for rx data path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMi1Hd2+i1E_7i0hkvWPtm74abo-_NP7KnnRnMzMkZJBiV6Jsg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Feb 2016 22:17:46 +0530
From:	Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	Badhri Jagan Sridharan <Badhri@...gle.com>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
	Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@...ic.nl>,
	Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@...sung.com>,
	Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] usb: gadget: u_ether: Add workqueue as bottom half
 handler for rx data path

On 9 February 2016 at 04:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 02:07:02AM +0530, Amit Pundir wrote:
>> Please ignore this one too. I should have build tested these patches
>> individually and not in particular series. I'll resend this patch.
>
> Send them in a numbered series so we know what order they have to be
> applied in.

Thanks I'll send them in a numbered series again. Since the patch
series didn't have much in common(feature wise), I changed my mind
right at the last moment to send them individually but that didn't go
well.

>
> And I always ignore RFC patches, if you can't be confident enough in
> submitting it for inclusion, why should we care?  :)

Yes I got your point. I was not intending to submit it yet, but hoping
to get any early feedback or objections from maintainers.

>
> You have of course tested these, right?

I have tested some of it for regressions, though not on the latest
kernel, but I will go through and re-test what I can. As I said I was
mainly just hoping for early maintainer feedback here.

Thank you for the suggestions and feedback Greg.

Regards,
Amit Pundir

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h