linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] usb: gadget: u_ether: Add workqueue as bottom half handler for rx data path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160209182348.GE31787@kroah.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:23:48 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	Badhri Jagan Sridharan <Badhri@...gle.com>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
	Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@...ic.nl>,
	Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@...sung.com>,
	Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] usb: gadget: u_ether: Add workqueue as bottom half
 handler for rx data path

On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:17:46PM +0530, Amit Pundir wrote:
> On 9 February 2016 at 04:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 02:07:02AM +0530, Amit Pundir wrote:
> >> Please ignore this one too. I should have build tested these patches
> >> individually and not in particular series. I'll resend this patch.
> >
> > Send them in a numbered series so we know what order they have to be
> > applied in.
> 
> Thanks I'll send them in a numbered series again. Since the patch
> series didn't have much in common(feature wise), I changed my mind
> right at the last moment to send them individually but that didn't go
> well.
> 
> >
> > And I always ignore RFC patches, if you can't be confident enough in
> > submitting it for inclusion, why should we care?  :)
> 
> Yes I got your point. I was not intending to submit it yet, but hoping
> to get any early feedback or objections from maintainers.

Again, if you don't care enough to think it is submittable, why should
we?  :)

Don't expect us to do your review and analysis work for you.

thanks,

greg k-h