| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <56B8B47F.4090304@synopsys.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:30:07 +0000
From: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
To: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
"helgaas@...nel.org" <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC: "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com" <CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] link up validation moved to pcie-designware
No problem! Thanks for your comments!
Joao
On 2/8/2016 3:29 PM, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Joao Pinto [mailto:Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com]
>> Sent: 08 February 2016 15:12
>> To: Gabriele Paoloni; Joao Pinto; helgaas@...nel.org
>> Cc: arnd@...db.de; linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>> kernel@...r.kernel.org; CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] link up validation moved to pcie-designware
>>
>>
>> Hi Gab,
>> This patch is part of the on going work of integrating a designware
>> platform
>> driver that is SoC agnostic. This code replication issue was raised
>> during
>> discussions.
>
> Ok sorry, I missed it then
>
> Cheers
>
> Gab
>
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Joao
>>
>> On 2/8/2016 1:03 PM, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
>>> Hi Joao
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: linux-pci-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-pci-
>>>> owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Joao Pinto
>>>> Sent: 08 February 2016 12:44
>>>> To: helgaas@...nel.org
>>>> Cc: arnd@...db.de; linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>>>> kernel@...r.kernel.org; CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com; Joao Pinto
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] link up validation moved to pcie-designware
>>>>
>>>> This patch goal is to centralize in pcie-designware the link up
>>>> validation. A new function was added to pci-designware that is
>>>> responsible for doing such a task. This was implemented in a form
>> that
>>>> permits flexibility for all SoCs.
>>>
>>> Looking at the patch I don't think this is really needed,
>>> it seems to me like it makes more confusion in reading the
>>> drivers code.
>>>
>>> It is clear that each HW IP has got his own transient time
>>> in setting the link up, this is clear looking at the code
>>> of the single drivers now.
>>>
>>> With the modification you are proposing we are seeing
>>> drivers calls with magic numbers and the need for the
>>> reader to go and look into the designware framework to
>>> understand a function that is not even designware
>>> specific (in fact all these drivers need to wait different
>>> times according to their HW IP and some other drivers do
>>> not need to wait at all...)
>>>
>>> BTW I am quite new to PCIe so let's see what the other guys
>>> think...
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Gab
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Joao Pinto <jpinto@...opsys.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c | 11 +++--------
>>>> drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c | 11 ++---------
>>>> drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c | 11 +++--------
>>>> drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h | 2 ++
>>>> drivers/pci/host/pcie-spear13xx.c | 12 ++----------
>>>> 6 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-
>>>> dra7xx.c
>>>> index 8c36880..e425944 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c
>>>> @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
>>>> * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>>>> */
>>>>
>>>> -#include <linux/delay.h>
>>>> #include <linux/err.h>
>>>> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>>> #include <linux/irq.h>
>>>> @@ -108,7 +107,6 @@ static int dra7xx_pcie_establish_link(struct
>>>> pcie_port *pp)
>>>> {
>>>> struct dra7xx_pcie *dra7xx = to_dra7xx_pcie(pp);
>>>> u32 reg;
>>>> - unsigned int retries;
>>>>
>>>> if (dw_pcie_link_up(pp)) {
>>>> dev_err(pp->dev, "link is already up\n");
>>>> @@ -119,13 +117,10 @@ static int dra7xx_pcie_establish_link(struct
>>>> pcie_port *pp)
>>>> reg |= LTSSM_EN;
>>>> dra7xx_pcie_writel(dra7xx, PCIECTRL_DRA7XX_CONF_DEVICE_CMD, reg);
>>>>
>>>> - for (retries = 0; retries < 1000; retries++) {
>>>> - if (dw_pcie_link_up(pp))
>>>> - return 0;
>>>> - usleep_range(10, 20);
>>>> - }
>>>> + /* check if the link is up or not */
>>>> + if (!dw_pcie_check_link_is_up(pp, 1000, 10, 20))
>>>> + return 0;
>>>>
>>>> - dev_err(pp->dev, "link is not up\n");
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-
>>>> exynos.c
>>>> index 01095e1..770c45a 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c
>>>> @@ -318,7 +318,6 @@ static int exynos_pcie_establish_link(struct
>>>> pcie_port *pp)
>>>> {
>>>> struct exynos_pcie *exynos_pcie = to_exynos_pcie(pp);
>>>> u32 val;
>>>> - unsigned int retries;
>>>>
>>>> if (dw_pcie_link_up(pp)) {
>>>> dev_err(pp->dev, "Link already up\n");
>>>> @@ -357,13 +356,8 @@ static int exynos_pcie_establish_link(struct
>>>> pcie_port *pp)
>>>> PCIE_APP_LTSSM_ENABLE);
>>>>
>>>> /* check if the link is up or not */
>>>> - for (retries = 0; retries < 10; retries++) {
>>>> - if (dw_pcie_link_up(pp)) {
>>>> - dev_info(pp->dev, "Link up\n");
>>>> - return 0;
>>>> - }
>>>> - mdelay(100);
>>>> - }
>>>> + if (!dw_pcie_check_link_is_up(pp, 10, 100000, 110000))
>>>> + return 0;
>>>>
>>>> while (exynos_phy_readl(exynos_pcie, PCIE_PHY_PLL_LOCKED) == 0) {
>>>> val = exynos_blk_readl(exynos_pcie, PCIE_PHY_PLL_LOCKED);
>>>> @@ -372,7 +366,6 @@ static int exynos_pcie_establish_link(struct
>>>> pcie_port *pp)
>>>> /* power off phy */
>>>> exynos_pcie_power_off_phy(pp);
>>>>
>>>> - dev_err(pp->dev, "PCIe Link Fail\n");
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-
>> imx6.c
>>>> index 22e8224..9e323be 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
>>>> @@ -330,15 +330,10 @@ static void imx6_pcie_init_phy(struct
>> pcie_port
>>>> *pp)
>>>>
>>>> static int imx6_pcie_wait_for_link(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>>> {
>>>> - unsigned int retries;
>>>> -
>>>> - for (retries = 0; retries < 200; retries++) {
>>>> - if (dw_pcie_link_up(pp))
>>>> - return 0;
>>>> - usleep_range(100, 1000);
>>>> - }
>>>> + /* check if the link is up or not */
>>>> + if (!dw_pcie_check_link_is_up(pp, 200, 100, 1000))
>>>> + return 0;
>>>>
>>>> - dev_err(pp->dev, "phy link never came up\n");
>>>> dev_dbg(pp->dev, "DEBUG_R0: 0x%08x, DEBUG_R1: 0x%08x\n",
>>>> readl(pp->dbi_base + PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R0),
>>>> readl(pp->dbi_base + PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1));
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>>>> b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>>>> index 540f077..6725231 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>>>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>>>> #include <linux/pci_regs.h>
>>>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>>> #include <linux/types.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>>>>
>>>> #include "pcie-designware.h"
>>>>
>>>> @@ -380,6 +381,25 @@ static struct msi_controller dw_pcie_msi_chip =
>> {
>>>> .teardown_irq = dw_msi_teardown_irq,
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> +int dw_pcie_check_link_is_up(struct pcie_port *pp, int max_ret, int
>>>> sleep_min,
>>>> + int sleep_max)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int retries;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* check if the link is up or not */
>>>> + for (retries = 0; retries < max_ret; retries++) {
>>>> + if (dw_pcie_link_up(pp)) {
>>>> + dev_info(pp->dev, "link up\n");
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> + }
>>>> + usleep_range(sleep_min, sleep_max);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + dev_err(pp->dev, "phy link never came up\n");
>>>> +
>>>> + return 1;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> int dw_pcie_link_up(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>>> {
>>>> if (pp->ops->link_up)
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
>>>> b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
>>>> index 2356d29..b077fe0 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
>>>> @@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ int dw_pcie_cfg_read(void __iomem *addr, int size,
>>>> u32 *val);
>>>> int dw_pcie_cfg_write(void __iomem *addr, int size, u32 val);
>>>> irqreturn_t dw_handle_msi_irq(struct pcie_port *pp);
>>>> void dw_pcie_msi_init(struct pcie_port *pp);
>>>> +int dw_pcie_check_link_is_up(struct pcie_port *pp, int max_ret, int
>>>> sleep_min,
>>>> + int sleep_max);
>>>> int dw_pcie_link_up(struct pcie_port *pp);
>>>> void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp);
>>>> int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp);
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-spear13xx.c
>> b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-
>>>> spear13xx.c
>>>> index b95b756..5c24595 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-spear13xx.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-spear13xx.c
>>>> @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
>>>> */
>>>>
>>>> #include <linux/clk.h>
>>>> -#include <linux/delay.h>
>>>> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>>> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>>> #include <linux/module.h>
>>>> @@ -149,7 +148,6 @@ static int spear13xx_pcie_establish_link(struct
>>>> pcie_port *pp)
>>>> struct spear13xx_pcie *spear13xx_pcie = to_spear13xx_pcie(pp);
>>>> struct pcie_app_reg *app_reg = spear13xx_pcie->app_base;
>>>> u32 exp_cap_off = EXP_CAP_ID_OFFSET;
>>>> - unsigned int retries;
>>>>
>>>> if (dw_pcie_link_up(pp)) {
>>>> dev_err(pp->dev, "link already up\n");
>>>> @@ -201,15 +199,9 @@ static int spear13xx_pcie_establish_link(struct
>>>> pcie_port *pp)
>>>> &app_reg->app_ctrl_0);
>>>>
>>>> /* check if the link is up or not */
>>>> - for (retries = 0; retries < 10; retries++) {
>>>> - if (dw_pcie_link_up(pp)) {
>>>> - dev_info(pp->dev, "link up\n");
>>>> - return 0;
>>>> - }
>>>> - mdelay(100);
>>>> - }
>>>> + if (!dw_pcie_check_link_is_up(pp, 10, 100000, 110000))
>>>> + return 0;
>>>>
>>>> - dev_err(pp->dev, "link Fail\n");
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 1.8.1.5
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci"
>> in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists