[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160209112732.GB500@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 12:27:32 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com, vishal.l.verma@...el.com,
micah.parrish@....com, brian.boylston@....com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/lib/copy_user_64.S: Handle 4-byte nocache copy
* Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 11:27:41AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > So another pet peeve of mine is to not use numeric labels, please use
> > descriptively named labels instead.
>
> ... and prepend them with ".L" so that they become local labels.
Yes. A good example to follow would be arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S.
Btw., IIRC GAS is being silly about .L, i.e. there's a difference between these
two variants:
.Lerror_entry_from_usermode_swapgs:
.L_error_entry_from_usermode_swapgs:
the latter would be easier to read, but does not result in a local label last I
checked.
Right?
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists