linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 1/6] regmap: irq: add apis to unmap the mapped irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160209112728.GB13270@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:27:28 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, lee.jones@...aro.org,
	alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com, k.kozlowski@...sung.com,
	javier@....samsung.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	a.zummo@...ertech.it, cw00.choi@...sung.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/6] regmap: irq: add apis to unmap the mapped irq

On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 02:38:28PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 February 2016 10:46 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:

> >Do we need to dispose all virtual irq in regmap_del_irq_chip() before
> >actually removing domain?
> >This means we need to store the created virq  in regmap_irq_chip_data for
> >disposing it when removing the irq domain.

> It is easy for me to communicate through code to avoid any confusion. So do
> you want to say as follows? In this case, there is no need of any new API.

Something like that, yes.  Documentation/SubmittingPatches please...

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)