[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160209131425.GB21762@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 14:14:25 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...hat.com>
Cc: "Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)" <elliott@....com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] x86/efi: Print size in binary units in
efi_print_memmap
* Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...hat.com> wrote:
> >> [ 0.000000] efi: mem62: 0x0000001880000000-0x000000207fffffff ( 32 GB) .N....BTCU "Reserved"
>
> Sorry to disagree :), but I count myself somewhat intimate with UEFI
> (albeit more from the edk2 side), and while I can make sense of
>
> |NV| | | | | |WB|WT|WC|UC]
>
> I find
>
> .N....BTCU
>
> mostly undecipherable. :)
Ok - the longer variant is fine to me as well.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists