linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: consolidate "has lapic" checks into irq.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56BA00C4.4040108@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Feb 2016 16:07:48 +0100
From:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:	Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: consolidate "has lapic" checks into irq.c



On 09/02/2016 15:05, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2016-02-08 17:15+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
>> Do for kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer and kvm_inject_pending_timer_irqs
>> what the other irq.c routines have been doing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c b/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c
>> @@ -33,7 +33,10 @@
>>   */
>>  int kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  {
>> -	return apic_has_pending_timer(vcpu);
>> +	if (lapic_in_kernel(vcpu))
>> +		return apic_has_pending_timer(vcpu);
>> +
>> +	return true;
> 
> Apart from int/bool mismatch, it returned 0 before and that was correct.
> 

So that means "return 0;" implies "Reviewed-by"? :)

Paolo