[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160209100758.69d9006f@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:07:58 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>, catalin.marinas@....com,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: replace read_lock to rcu lock in call_step_hook
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 14:54:26 +0000
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Will,
The patch looks good to me. Do you want to take it through your tree?
It benefits mainline too as a rcu_read_lock() is more efficient than
rwlocks. Although I will say this is a slow path anyway.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists