[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56BA0049.6070500@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 20:35:45 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
CC: <lee.jones@...aro.org>, <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
<k.kozlowski@...sung.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<a.zummo@...ertech.it>, <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing
domain
On Tuesday 09 February 2016 08:44 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:27:22AM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
>> I believe this patch could be picked separately and not made part of
>> this series since is fixing a bug that happens on most drivers using
>> the regmap-irq API. This will avoid cross-subsystem churn for people.
> Yes, please don't mix things in when there are no dependencies.
>
Do I need to resend the patches on which 1/6 is not in series?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists