linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 9 Feb 2016 12:21:15 -0300
From:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	lee.jones@...aro.org, alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com,
	k.kozlowski@...sung.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	a.zummo@...ertech.it, cw00.choi@...sung.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before
 removing domain

Hello Laxman,

On 02/09/2016 12:05 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 09 February 2016 08:44 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:27:22AM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>
>>> I believe this patch could be picked separately and not made part of
>>> this series since is fixing a bug that happens on most drivers using
>>> the regmap-irq API. This will avoid cross-subsystem churn for people.
>> Yes, please don't mix things in when there are no dependencies.
>>
>
> Do I need to resend the patches on which 1/6 is not in series?
>

You will need to re-spin anyways since patch 6/6 does not apply
cleanly anymore on top of rtc-next as we talked before.

So make your v7 to only include patches 2-6 and post 1/6 as a
separate patch so Mark can pick it through the regmap tree.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America