[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160209152100.GD30378@potion.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 16:21:00 +0100
From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: consolidate "has lapic" checks into irq.c
2016-02-09 16:07+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 09/02/2016 15:05, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> 2016-02-08 17:15+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
>>> int kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> + return true;
>>
>> Apart from int/bool mismatch, it returned 0 before and that was correct.
>>
>
> So that means "return 0;" implies "Reviewed-by"? :)
Yes. (Also for "false" and "bool kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer...". :])
Powered by blists - more mailing lists