linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 4/4] Watchdog: introduce ARM SBSA watchdog driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADyBb7sqKiFfrwkKUYOAXY3JCZzEM2jtR3Xac_ihafxf_McsLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Feb 2016 01:47:28 +0800
From:	Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
To:	Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Paweł Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Jon Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Linaro ACPI Mailman List <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
	rruigrok@...eaurora.org, "Abdulhamid, Harb" <harba@...eaurora.org>,
	Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
	Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>,
	G Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
	Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Leo Duran <leo.duran@....com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/4] Watchdog: introduce ARM SBSA watchdog driver

Hi Timur,

On 10 February 2016 at 01:39, Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> fu.wei@...aro.org wrote:
>
>> +               if (!action)
>> +                       dev_warn(dev, "fall back to signle stage
>> mode.\n");
>
>
> "falling back to single stage mode"

Thanks for your correction.  :-)
Will fixed it

>
> Acked-by: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
>

Thanks, will add this

> The whole "calculate the timeouts different if 'action' is enabled" seems
> clunky to me, but I can't think of a better way to handle it.
>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
> Forum, a Linux Foundation collaborative project.



-- 
Best regards,

Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch
Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct)
Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile)
Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15,
One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District,
Shanghai,China 200021