linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] Staging: rts5208: rtsx_transport.c: Align to open parenthesis

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:51:26 +0530
From:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:	Shaun Ren <shaun.ren@...ux.com>
Cc:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rjui@...adcom.com,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, sbranden@...adcom.com,
	jonmason@...adcom.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, joe@...ches.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] Staging: rts5208: rtsx_transport.c: Align to open
 parenthesis

On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 05:31:18PM -0800, Shaun Ren wrote:
> This patch fixes the alignment issue reported by checkpatch.pl:
> 
> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shaun Ren <shaun.ren@...ux.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
<snip>
>  
> @@ -732,11 +739,13 @@ int rtsx_transfer_data_partial(struct rtsx_chip *chip, u8 card,
>  	if (rtsx_chk_stat(chip, RTSX_STAT_ABORT))
>  		return -EIO;
>  
> -	if (use_sg)
> -		err = rtsx_transfer_sglist_adma_partial(chip, card,
> -				(struct scatterlist *)buf, use_sg,
> -				index, offset, (int)len, dma_dir, timeout);
> -	else
> +	if (use_sg) {
> +		struct scatterlist *sg = (struct scatterlist *)buf;

this change is not documented in commit message.	
> +
> +		err = rtsx_transfer_sglist_adma_partial(chip, card, sg, use_sg,
> +							index, offset, (int)len,
> +							dma_dir, timeout);
> +	} else

This will introduce new checkpatch warning. If you are giving braces in
the if block then you need to have braces in the else part also.

regards
sudip