linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/1] af_packet: Raw socket destruction warning fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <1455105900-15710-1-git-send-email-maninder1.s@samsung.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Feb 2016 17:35:00 +0530
From:	Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@...sung.com>
To:	davem@...emloft.net, willemb@...gle.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, al.drozdov@...il.com, eyal.birger@...il.com,
	tklauser@...tanz.ch, fruggeri@...stanetworks.com,
	dwmw2@...radead.org
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ajeet.y@...sung.com, pankaj.m@...sung.com, gh007.kim@...sung.com,
	hakbong5.lee@...sung.com, akhilesh.k@...sung.com,
	Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@...sung.com>,
	Vaneet Narang <v.narang@...sung.com>,
	Amit Nagal <amit.nagal@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] af_packet: Raw socket destruction warning fix

This Patch fixes below warning:-
WARNING: at net/packet/af_packet.c:xxx packet_sock_destruct

There is following race between packet_rcv and packet_close
which keeps unfree packet in receive queue.

CPU 1					CPU2
packet_rcv

					packet_close                       
skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk);

					skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_receive_queue);

spin_lock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
__skb_queue_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue, skb);
spin_unlock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);

Signed-off-by: Vaneet Narang <v.narang@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Nagal <amit.nagal@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@...sung.com>
---
 net/packet/af_packet.c |   11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
index 992396a..e6047e6 100644
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -1310,7 +1310,10 @@ static int packet_rcv_has_room(struct packet_sock *po, struct sk_buff *skb)
 
 static void packet_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
 {
+	/* Purge queues */
+
 	skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_error_queue);
+	skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
 
 	WARN_ON(atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc));
 	WARN_ON(atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc));
@@ -1991,6 +1994,9 @@ static int packet_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
 	if (!net_eq(dev_net(dev), sock_net(sk)))
 		goto drop;
 
+	if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD))
+		goto drop;
+
 	skb->dev = dev;
 
 	if (dev->header_ops) {
@@ -2053,7 +2059,6 @@ static int packet_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
 	if (pskb_trim(skb, snaplen))
 		goto drop_n_acct;
 
-	skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk);
 	skb->dev = NULL;
 	skb_dst_drop(skb);
 
@@ -2061,6 +2066,7 @@ static int packet_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
 	nf_reset(skb);
 
 	spin_lock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+	skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk);
 	po->stats.stats1.tp_packets++;
 	sock_skb_set_dropcount(sk, skb);
 	__skb_queue_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue, skb);
@@ -2899,9 +2905,6 @@ static int packet_release(struct socket *sock)
 	sock_orphan(sk);
 	sock->sk = NULL;
 
-	/* Purge queues */
-
-	skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
 	packet_free_pending(po);
 	sk_refcnt_debug_release(sk);
 
-- 
1.7.9.5