[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160210160912.GF26950@x1>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:09:12 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Cc: alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com, k.kozlowski@...sung.com,
javier@....samsung.com, broonie@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
cw00.choi@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 4/5] mfd: max77686: do not set i2c client data for rtc
i2c client
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> There is different RTC I2C address for RTC block in MAX77686.
> Driver is creating dummy i2c client for this address to access
> the register of this IP block.
>
> As there is no call to i2c_get_clientdata() for rtc_i2c client,
> there is no need to store pointer and hence removing the call
> to set client data for rtc i2c client.
>
> Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
> CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> CC: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
>
> ---
> This is new in this series based on review comment from V1.
>
> Changes from V2:
> - Rephrase description.
> - Added reviewed by.
>
> Changes from V3:
> - None, become 5th on series.
>
> Changes from V4:
> None
>
> Changes from V5:
> None
>
> Changes from V6:
> Make this as 4th of series as regmap change applied independently.
>
> drivers/mfd/max77686.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
Appart from the subject line being wrong:
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
[...]
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists