[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <56C111DF.2020005@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 08:46:39 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>, lee.jones@...aro.org,
alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com, javier@....samsung.com,
broonie@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
a.zummo@...ertech.it
Cc: cw00.choi@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 4/5] mfd: max77686: do not set i2c client data for rtc
i2c client
On 10.02.2016 02:26, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> There is different RTC I2C address for RTC block in MAX77686.
> Driver is creating dummy i2c client for this address to access
> the register of this IP block.
>
> As there is no call to i2c_get_clientdata() for rtc_i2c client,
> there is no need to store pointer and hence removing the call
> to set client data for rtc i2c client.
>
> Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
> CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> CC: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
>
FWIW, on max77686:
Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists