[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160210163622.GA1390@deathstar>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:36:22 -0600
From: Michael Welling <mwelling@...e.org>
To: Sricharan <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
Cc: 'Daniel Baluta' <daniel.baluta@...el.com>,
'Wolfram Sang' <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
'Jonathan Cameron' <jic23@...nel.org>,
'Hartmut Knaack' <knaack.h@....de>,
'Lars-Peter Clausen' <lars@...afoo.de>,
'Peter Meerwald-Stadler' <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
'Linux Kernel Mailing List' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
'Lucas De Marchi' <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
'Andy Gross' <agross@...eaurora.org>,
'Pramod Gurav' <pramod.gurav@...rtplayin.com>,
'Bjorn Andersson' <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>,
'Guenter Roeck' <linux@...ck-us.net>, eibach@...ys.de,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] iio: adc: Add TI ADS1015 ADC driver support
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 08:39:04PM +0530, Sricharan wrote:
> > Hi Sricharan,
> >
> > Are you looking at pca9685_pwm_probe in drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
> > right?
> >
> Yes.
>
> > I'm asking this because this driver doesn't seem to support runtime pm and
> > there is no check for regmap_write/regmap_write return code in the probe
> > function.
> Hmm to be clear, so it’s the pm_runtime_getsync from i2c-qup which fails right ?
> I was tracking that when there are i2c_xfers from pwm. I did not see any failures there.
> So wanted to know the correct sequence to reproduce.
>
The problem was discovered using the patch that this thread is on. The PWM driver does
not have the problem.
When the driver in this patch called pm_runtime_get_sync you got -EINVAL back.
> Regards,
> Sricharan
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists