[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CY1PR11MB0218E705FD1EA084E74BF23094A80@CY1PR11MB0218.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:42:22 +0000
From: Anil Gurumurthy <Anil.Gurumurthy@...gic.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
CC: James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND] bfa: deinline __bfa_trc() and __bfa_trc32()
You could remove the __bfa_trc32() routine
Thanks,
Acked-by: Anil Gurumurthy <anil.gurumurthy@...gic.com>
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin K. Petersen [mailto:martin.petersen@...cle.com]
Sent: 10 February 2016 22:59
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>; Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>; Anil Gurumurthy <Anil.Gurumurthy@...gic.com>; Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>; Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>; Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>; linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] bfa: deinline __bfa_trc() and __bfa_trc32()
>>>>> "Denys" == Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com> writes:
Denys> __bfa_trc32() is very similar, so it is uninlined too. However,
Denys> it appears to be unused, therefore this patch ifdefs it out.
Why don't we just drop it?
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists