[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2946666.LCVBdOefy1@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 02:25:15 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Avoid unnecessary locking in show() and store()
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
The show() and store() routines in the cpufreq core don't need to
acquire all of the locks to check if the struct freq_attr they want
to use really provides the callbacks they need as expected, so change
them to avoid doing that.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 27 +++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -862,13 +862,11 @@ static ssize_t show(struct kobject *kobj
struct freq_attr *fattr = to_attr(attr);
ssize_t ret;
- down_read(&policy->rwsem);
-
- if (fattr->show)
- ret = fattr->show(policy, buf);
- else
- ret = -EIO;
+ if (!fattr->show)
+ return -EIO;
+ down_read(&policy->rwsem);
+ ret = fattr->show(policy, buf);
up_read(&policy->rwsem);
return ret;
@@ -881,20 +879,17 @@ static ssize_t store(struct kobject *kob
struct freq_attr *fattr = to_attr(attr);
ssize_t ret = -EINVAL;
- get_online_cpus();
-
- if (!cpu_online(policy->cpu))
- goto unlock;
+ if (!fattr->store)
+ return -EIO;
- down_write(&policy->rwsem);
+ get_online_cpus();
- if (fattr->store)
+ if (cpu_online(policy->cpu)) {
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
ret = fattr->store(policy, buf, count);
- else
- ret = -EIO;
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
+ }
- up_write(&policy->rwsem);
-unlock:
put_online_cpus();
return ret;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists