[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160211193415.GA24465@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 12:34:15 -0700
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] tpm: fix the cleanup of struct tpm_chip
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 05:30:30AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> If the initialization fails before tpm_chip_register(), put_device()
> will be not called, which causes release callback not to be called.
> This patch fixes the issue by adding put_device() to devres list of
> the parent device.
>
> Fixes: 313d21eeab ("tpm: device class for tpm")
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> index 1a9dcee..ea904d1 100644
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> @@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpmm_chip_alloc(struct device *dev,
> chip->cdev.owner = chip->pdev->driver->owner;
> chip->cdev.kobj.parent = &chip->dev.kobj;
>
> + devm_add_action(dev, (void (*)(void *)) put_device, &chip->dev);
> +
Erm, don't forget the error handling here.
Something like this:
rc = devm_add_action(dev, (void (*)(void *)) put_device, &chip->dev);
if (rc) {
put_device(&chip->dev);
return ERR_PTR(rc);
}
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists