[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160212105736.GA11854@linux-mips.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:57:36 +0100
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...tec.com>
Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
"Steven J. Hill" <Steven.Hill@...tec.com>,
Joshua Kinard <kumba@...too.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@...tec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: tlb-r4k: panic if the MMU doesn't support PAGE_SIZE
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 07:37:12PM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> > > index 08318ec..4330315 100644
> > > --- a/arch/mips/mm/tlb-r4k.c
> > > +++ b/arch/mips/mm/tlb-r4k.c
> > > @@ -486,6 +487,10 @@ static void r4k_tlb_configure(void)
> > > * be set to fixed-size pages.
> > > */
> > > write_c0_pagemask(PM_DEFAULT_MASK);
> > > + back_to_back_c0_hazard();
> > > + if (read_c0_pagemask() != PM_DEFAULT_MASK)
> > > + panic("MMU doesn't support PAGE_SIZE=0x%lx", PAGE_SIZE);
>
> I think it would make sense to report here what the minimum/maximum page
> size actually supported is, so that the users know what there might be
> after.
This is a very unlikely error condition to be hit so I'd rather keep it
simple. Even just BUG_ON() would suffice.
Ralf
Powered by blists - more mailing lists