[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJX+MuN3LXW-bSTo1cj2JM0h_dw3JYx6jF7EUZVgDf=gQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:44:28 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: Bernhard Walle <bernhard@...lle.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: fec: Add "phy-reset-active-low" property to DT
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> This is what the gpio flags are for. Why can't you use that?
>
> This has already been discussed in v1:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/867
Thanks. That's fine, but that detail should be explained in the
binding. Is there a specific compatible string this can be limited to?
It should also be stated that the GPIO flags should be correct rather
than ignored implying I can put in whatever I want there. Then someday
if no more wrong dtbs are in the wild, it can switch back to using
gpio flags. Also, phy-reset-active-low should be prefixed with "fsl,".
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists