[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56BE369D.6090007@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:46:37 -0800
From: "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@...aro.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: aryabinin@...tuozzo.com, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace, kasan: silence Kasan warning in check_stack
On 2/12/2016 11:35 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 10:39:42 -0800
> Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> kernel/trace/trace_stack.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c b/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
>> index 202df6c..61e5e1e 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
>> @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ check_stack(unsigned long ip, unsigned long *stack)
>> for (; p < top && i < stack_trace_max.nr_entries; p++) {
>> if (stack_dump_trace[i] == ULONG_MAX)
>> break;
>> - if (*p == stack_dump_trace[i]) {
>
> Can you add a comment explaining this. Something like:
>
> /*
> * The READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() is used to let KASAN know that
> * this is not an stack-out-of-bounds error.
> */
Sure, will add in v2.
Thanks,
Yang
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Steve
>
>> + if ((READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*p)) == stack_dump_trace[i]) {
>> stack_dump_trace[x] = stack_dump_trace[i++];
>> this_size = stack_trace_index[x++] =
>> (top - p) * sizeof(unsigned long);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists