[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160212232221.GA31062@mail.hallyn.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:22:21 -0600
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@...il.com>,
LXC development mailing-list
<lxc-devel@...ts.linuxcontainers.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Aditya Kali <adityakali@...gle.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [lxc-devel] CGroup Namespaces (v10)
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:09:06AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:18:28AM +0100, Alban Crequy wrote:
> > I just noticed commit c38c4597e4bf ("netfilter: implement xt_cgroup
> > cgroup2 path match") which, as far as I understand, introduces a new
> > userland facing API containing the full cgroup path. Does it mean that
> > the cgroupns patchset should include cgroup path translation in
> > xt_cgroup?
>
> I don't think so. None of netfilter configuration is namespaced in
> any way. They're system-global by nature.
I assume at some point you'll want the set ported onto for-4.6 or
linux-next? My 2016-02-03/cgns set still cherrypick cleanly onto
for-4.6 at the moment, but I haven't tried linux-next, and I haven't
done build+test since 4.5-rc1 came out.
thanks,
-serge
Powered by blists - more mailing lists