[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160215211705.GQ3965@htj.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:17:05 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
Cc: Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@...il.com>,
LXC development mailing-list
<lxc-devel@...ts.linuxcontainers.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Aditya Kali <adityakali@...gle.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [lxc-devel] CGroup Namespaces (v10)
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 05:22:21PM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:09:06AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:18:28AM +0100, Alban Crequy wrote:
> > > I just noticed commit c38c4597e4bf ("netfilter: implement xt_cgroup
> > > cgroup2 path match") which, as far as I understand, introduces a new
> > > userland facing API containing the full cgroup path. Does it mean that
> > > the cgroupns patchset should include cgroup path translation in
> > > xt_cgroup?
> >
> > I don't think so. None of netfilter configuration is namespaced in
> > any way. They're system-global by nature.
>
> I assume at some point you'll want the set ported onto for-4.6 or
> linux-next? My 2016-02-03/cgns set still cherrypick cleanly onto
> for-4.6 at the moment, but I haven't tried linux-next, and I haven't
> done build+test since 4.5-rc1 came out.
I'm getting the following on top of the current for-4.6. Can you
please look into it?
[kernel/cgroup.c:219:13: error: ‘cgroupns_operations’ undeclared here (not in a function)
.ns.ops = &cgroupns_operations,
^
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists