linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2b 3/5] fs: btrfs: Use vfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 12 Feb 2016 23:01:22 -0800
From:	Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, y2038@...ts.linaro.org,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2b 3/5] fs: btrfs: Use vfs_time accessors

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Friday 12 February 2016 01:45:47 Deepa Dinamani wrote:
>> +       ts = vfs_time_to_timespec(inode->i_mtime);
>> +       if (!timespec_equal(&ts, &now))
>> +               inode->i_mtime = timespec_to_vfs_time(now);
>> +
>> +       ts = vfs_time_to_timespec(inode->i_mtime);
>> +       if (!timespec_equal(&ts, &now))
>> +               inode->i_ctime = timespec_to_vfs_time(now);
>>
>
> The second one needs to be fs_time_to_timespec(inode->i_ctime), not i_mtime.


Yes, you are correct.
I will wait for some consensus on the proposal to figure out which
version to post again.

Thanks,
-Deepa