| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <871t8ed5f0.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:21:55 +0800 From: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com> To: Chen Gong <gong.chen@...el.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Joshua Hunt <johunt@...mai.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ACPI, APEI: Memory leaks Hi, Gong, Joshua Hunt <johunt@...mai.com> writes: > While investigating a possible memory leak using kmemleak I came across the > following five leaks coming from APEI and ERST: > > unreferenced object 0xffff880402b6ee80 (size 32): > comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294669373 (age 318.183s) > hex dump (first 32 bytes): > 58 fe ab fa 03 88 ff ff 58 fe ab fa 03 88 ff ff X.......X....... > 18 50 ea dc 00 00 00 00 3f 50 ea dc 00 00 00 00 .P......?P...... > backtrace: > [<ffffffff82195c33>] create_object+0x103/0x2c0 > [<ffffffff826868b2>] kmemleak_alloc+0x82/0xc0 > [<ffffffff8218248b>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x17b/0x210 > [<ffffffff8241a6fa>] apei_res_add+0x19a/0x200 > [<ffffffff8241a7e2>] collect_res_callback+0x82/0xa0 > [<ffffffff8241a225>] apei_exec_for_each_entry+0x85/0xb0 > [<ffffffff8241a26a>] apei_exec_collect_resources+0x1a/0x20 > [<ffffffff82afe532>] erst_init+0x3d6/0x3e5 > [<ffffffff820004bd>] do_one_initcall+0x19d/0x1d0 > [<ffffffff82ac1152>] kernel_init_freeable+0x13d/0x1d6 > [<ffffffff82684a8e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0 > [<ffffffff826909d2>] ret_from_fork+0x42/0x70 > [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff > unreferenced object 0xffff880402b6ee40 (size 32): > comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294670231 (age 317.326s) > hex dump (first 32 bytes): > 68 fe ab fa 03 88 ff ff 68 fe ab fa 03 88 ff ff h.......h....... > b2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 b3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ > backtrace: > [<ffffffff82195c33>] create_object+0x103/0x2c0 > [<ffffffff826868b2>] kmemleak_alloc+0x82/0xc0 > [<ffffffff8218248b>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x17b/0x210 > [<ffffffff8241a6fa>] apei_res_add+0x19a/0x200 > [<ffffffff8241a7fc>] collect_res_callback+0x9c/0xa0 > [<ffffffff8241a225>] apei_exec_for_each_entry+0x85/0xb0 > [<ffffffff8241a26a>] apei_exec_collect_resources+0x1a/0x20 > [<ffffffff82afe532>] erst_init+0x3d6/0x3e5 > [<ffffffff820004bd>] do_one_initcall+0x19d/0x1d0 > [<ffffffff82ac1152>] kernel_init_freeable+0x13d/0x1d6 > [<ffffffff82684a8e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0 > [<ffffffff826909d2>] ret_from_fork+0x42/0x70 > [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff > unreferenced object 0xffff880402b6ee20 (size 32): > comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294672240 (age 315.317s) > hex dump (first 32 bytes): > 88 fd ab fa 03 88 ff ff 00 ee b6 02 04 88 ff ff ................ > 00 d0 15 cd 00 00 00 00 00 40 16 cd 00 00 00 00 .........@...... > backtrace: > [<ffffffff82195c33>] create_object+0x103/0x2c0 > [<ffffffff826868b2>] kmemleak_alloc+0x82/0xc0 > [<ffffffff8218248b>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x17b/0x210 > [<ffffffff8241a6fa>] apei_res_add+0x19a/0x200 > [<ffffffff8241a81a>] apei_get_res_callback+0x1a/0x20 > [<ffffffff823d0f8b>] acpi_nvs_for_each_region+0x2b/0x50 > [<ffffffff8241ae95>] apei_resources_request+0x95/0x380 > [<ffffffff82afe23e>] erst_init+0xe2/0x3e5 > [<ffffffff820004bd>] do_one_initcall+0x19d/0x1d0 > [<ffffffff82ac1152>] kernel_init_freeable+0x13d/0x1d6 > [<ffffffff82684a8e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0 > [<ffffffff826909d2>] ret_from_fork+0x42/0x70 > [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff > unreferenced object 0xffff880402b6ee00 (size 32): > comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294672400 (age 315.157s) > hex dump (first 32 bytes): > 20 ee b6 02 04 88 ff ff 88 fd ab fa 03 88 ff ff ............... > 00 80 f3 dc 00 00 00 00 00 60 a9 dd 00 00 00 00 .........`...... > backtrace: > [<ffffffff82195c33>] create_object+0x103/0x2c0 > [<ffffffff826868b2>] kmemleak_alloc+0x82/0xc0 > [<ffffffff8218248b>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x17b/0x210 > [<ffffffff8241a6fa>] apei_res_add+0x19a/0x200 > [<ffffffff8241a81a>] apei_get_res_callback+0x1a/0x20 > [<ffffffff823d0f8b>] acpi_nvs_for_each_region+0x2b/0x50 > [<ffffffff8241ae95>] apei_resources_request+0x95/0x380 > [<ffffffff82afe23e>] erst_init+0xe2/0x3e5 > [<ffffffff820004bd>] do_one_initcall+0x19d/0x1d0 > [<ffffffff82ac1152>] kernel_init_freeable+0x13d/0x1d6 > [<ffffffff82684a8e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0 > [<ffffffff826909d2>] ret_from_fork+0x42/0x70 > [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff > unreferenced object 0xffff880402b6ede0 (size 32): > comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294672863 (age 314.698s) > hex dump (first 32 bytes): > a8 fd ab fa 03 88 ff ff a8 fd ab fa 03 88 ff ff ................ > 00 00 00 f8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fc 00 00 00 00 ................ > backtrace: > [<ffffffff82195c33>] create_object+0x103/0x2c0 > [<ffffffff826868b2>] kmemleak_alloc+0x82/0xc0 > [<ffffffff8218248b>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x17b/0x210 > [<ffffffff8241a6fa>] apei_res_add+0x19a/0x200 > [<ffffffff8241a81a>] apei_get_res_callback+0x1a/0x20 > [<ffffffff82582d61>] pci_mmcfg_for_each_region+0x51/0x60 > [<ffffffff8241b14a>] apei_resources_request+0x34a/0x380 > [<ffffffff82afe23e>] erst_init+0xe2/0x3e5 > [<ffffffff820004bd>] do_one_initcall+0x19d/0x1d0 > [<ffffffff82ac1152>] kernel_init_freeable+0x13d/0x1d6 > [<ffffffff82684a8e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0 > [<ffffffff826909d2>] ret_from_fork+0x42/0x70 > [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff > > The issue has been reported a handful of times upstream. Here is one of the previous > reports: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/11/149 > > This series resolves the reported leaks and kmemleak is clean with these patches applied. > > Joshua Hunt (2): > ACPI, APEI: Fix leaked resources > ACPI, APEI, ERST: Fixed leaked resources in erst_init > > drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c | 5 +++++ > drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+) Do you have time to take a look at this patchset? Best Regards, Huang, Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists