[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160215163524.GI19598@localhost>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:05:24 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] dmaengine: pxa_dma: fix the maximum requestor line
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:23:18PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> @@ -1399,13 +1405,17 @@ static int pxad_probe(struct platform_device *op)
> return PTR_ERR(pdev->base);
>
> of_id = of_match_device(pxad_dt_ids, &op->dev);
> - if (of_id)
> + if (of_id) {
> of_property_read_u32(op->dev.of_node, "#dma-channels",
> &dma_channels);
> - else if (pdata && pdata->dma_channels)
> + of_property_read_u32(op->dev.of_node, "#requestors",
> + &nb_requestors);
I think we should check the return value here. This might be err in case
when we have older DT on platform, but still should work with default in
that case
> + } else if (pdata && pdata->dma_channels) {
> dma_channels = pdata->dma_channels;
> - else
> + nb_requestors = pdata->nb_requestors;
> + } else {
> dma_channels = 32; /* default 32 channel */
> + }
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists