[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56C20DD6.8050604@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:41:42 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: arm qemu test failures due to 'driver-core: platform: probe
of-devices only using list of compatibles'
On 15/02/16 15:41, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 02/15/2016 02:59 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> Hello Guenter,
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 08:50:10AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> Uwe,
>>>
>>> Your patch 'driver-core: platform: probe of-devices only using list of
>>> compatibles' causes the following qemu tests to crash in -next.
>>>
>>> arm:vexpress-a9:vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9
>>> arm:vexpress-a15:vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1
>>> arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9
>>> arm:vexpress-a15:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1
>>>
>>> Crash log:
>>>
>>> VFS: Cannot open root device "mmcblk0" or unknown-block(0,0): error -6
>>> Please append a correct "root=" boot option; here are the available
>>> partitions:
>>> 1f00 131072 mtdblock0 (driver?)
>>> 1f01 32768 mtdblock1 (driver?)
>>> Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
>>> unknown-block(0,0)
>>
>> Can you provide a complete boot log? This might already reveal which
>> device is failing. It might not be the mmci device but something it
>> depends on (clock, bus parent, irq).
>>
>
> Sure, something else may be failing, but why does reverting your patch
> fix the problem ?
>
> Anyway, complete logs are at http://kerneltests.org/builders.
>
> http://kerneltests.org/builders/qemu-arm-next/builds/376/steps/qemubuildcommand/logs/stdio
>
>
Sorry for missing this earlier, I could reproduce this on my TC2.
The issue is with card-detect gpio probing. It's not related to AMBA
probing as discussed on the mail thread.
mfd_add_device adds devices with of_node when cell->of_compatible is
matched, but the device created is expected to be matched based on name
which the patch under discussion clearly breaks.
One other option I see is to set driver_override for mfd devices
(something like below) but I am not sure that can be generic.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists