[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56C23088.8050400@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 12:09:44 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Crashes in arm qemu emulations due to 'cpufreq: governor: Replace
timers with utilization ...'
On 02/15/2016 11:58 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> [160215 11:41]:
>> On 02/15/2016 11:01 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>
>>> https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/next/kernel/next-20160215/
>>>
>>> The SMP ones seem to fail with some regulator issues?
>>>
>>
>> There is another problem, introduced with 6a0712f6f199e ("PM / OPP: Add
>> dev_pm_opp_set_rate()"). The kernelci boot log for next-20160212:omap3-overo-tobi
>> and others experience that problem.
>>
>> Essentially, the code now assumes that a CPU clock always has a voltage
>> regulator attached to it, which is not correct. I sent out a patch to fix
>> that problem a minute ago.
>
> Yes that fixed it thanks.
>
Confirmed. With this patch plus mine, all arm qemu tests are again passing for me.
Thanks,
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists