[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hzVB0+H4nuCun3mmrES3UQ3+Rs1uz5YGu5sv4G3XU+nQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:37:39 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Crashes in arm qemu emulations due to 'cpufreq: governor: Replace
timers with utilization ...'
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
> * Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> [160215 11:41]:
>> On 02/15/2016 11:01 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> >
>> >https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/next/kernel/next-20160215/
>> >
>> >The SMP ones seem to fail with some regulator issues?
>> >
>>
>> There is another problem, introduced with 6a0712f6f199e ("PM / OPP: Add
>> dev_pm_opp_set_rate()"). The kernelci boot log for next-20160212:omap3-overo-tobi
>> and others experience that problem.
>>
>> Essentially, the code now assumes that a CPU clock always has a voltage
>> regulator attached to it, which is not correct. I sent out a patch to fix
>> that problem a minute ago.
>
> Yes that fixed it thanks.
Can you please also check if this alternative fix from Viresh works:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8316611/
?
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists