linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Move syscon reboot/poweroff to common dtsi for Exynos

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <56C25982.4020301@samsung.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:04:34 +0900
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	k.kozlowski.k@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Move syscon reboot/poweroff to common dtsi for
 Exynos

On 15.02.2016 22:38, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>
>> In some of the DTSI this was under "soc" node, not at top-level.
>> Unfortunately we do not have consistency here - some DTSI have "soc",
> 
> Yes, I noticed this but as you said not all DTSI have a soc node
> and that's why I made it top level in the DTSI.
> 
>> some not. Anyway I think we should move to "soc" version.
>>
> 
> Not sure I'm following, did you mean to do it as a follow up or
> to add a soc node for the missing DTSI as a part of this series?

I meant to send a v2 with this under "soc" node even though on some DTS
we do not have the "soc". Optional follow up would be to make DTS
consistent and move nodes under "soc"... but that would be also a lot of
churn.

Best regards,
Krzysztof