[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56C32AFC.6030905@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:58:20 -0300
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: k.kozlowski.k@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Move syscon reboot/poweroff to common dtsi for
Exynos
Hello Krzysztof,
On 02/15/2016 08:04 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15.02.2016 22:38, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>>
>>> In some of the DTSI this was under "soc" node, not at top-level.
>>> Unfortunately we do not have consistency here - some DTSI have "soc",
>>
>> Yes, I noticed this but as you said not all DTSI have a soc node
>> and that's why I made it top level in the DTSI.
>>
>>> some not. Anyway I think we should move to "soc" version.
>>>
>>
>> Not sure I'm following, did you mean to do it as a follow up or
>> to add a soc node for the missing DTSI as a part of this series?
>
> I meant to send a v2 with this under "soc" node even though on some DTS
> we do not have the "soc". Optional follow up would be to make DTS
> consistent and move nodes under "soc"... but that would be also a lot of
> churn.
>
Thanks for the clarification. I'll post a v2 then moving under a soc node.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
Powered by blists - more mailing lists