linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] HID: fix hid_ignore_special

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1602161104400.22700@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date:	Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:05:45 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To:	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
cc:	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: fix hid_ignore_special_drivers module parameter

On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:

> hid_ignore_special_drivers works fine until hid_scan_report
> autodetects and reassign devices (for hid-multitouch,
> hid-microsoft and hid-rmi).
> 
> Simplify the handling of the parameter: if it is there, use
> hid-generic, no matter what, and if not, scan the device or
> rely on the hid_have_special_driver table.
> 
> This was detected while trying to disable hid-multitouch on
> a Surface Pro cover which prevented to use the keyboard.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
> CC: stable@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> 
> Hi Jiri,
> 
> not sure if we should keep or not the stable@ tag. The issue was there for a
> long time, and nobody complained. It's up to you.

I've now applied it to for-4.5/upstream-fixes, but will wait if there is 
any other more important fix that'd trigger the push of this branch to 
Linus; otherwise it'll go in the merge window pile and will get backported 
to -stable later.

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs