linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] ARM: mps2: introduce MPS2 platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:35:43 +0000
From:	Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	linux@....linux.org.uk, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, mark.rutland@....com,
	pawel.moll@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
	galak@...eaurora.org, jslaby@...e.cz, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	andy.shevchenko@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linus.walleij@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] ARM: mps2: introduce MPS2 platform

On 16/02/16 10:56, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 February 2016 10:08:11 Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>> The Cortex-M Prototyping System (or V2M-MPS2) is designed for
>> prototyping and evaluation Cortex-M family of processors including the
>> latest Cortex-M7
>>
>> It comes with a range of useful peripherals including 8MB single cycle
>> SRAM, 16MB PSRAM, Ethernet, QSVGA touch screen panel, 4bit RGB VGA
>> connector, Audio, SPI and GPIO.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/Kconfig                 |    8 ++++++++
>>  arch/arm/Makefile                |    1 +
>>  arch/arm/mach-mps2/Makefile      |    1 +
>>  arch/arm/mach-mps2/Makefile.boot |    3 +++
>>  arch/arm/mach-mps2/dtmachine.c   |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>
> 
> We are in the (slow) process of consolidating the ARM reference platforms
> (versatile, integrator, realview, vexpress) into one place.
> 

Thanks for information! Sometime ago I saw on a list you had some
thoughts on consolidating M-class platforms since most of them follow
quite the same pattern (I'm looking at efm32 and stm32). So, shouldn't
this platform consider that way?

> I'd suggest adding all this to the mach-vexpress directory rather than
> a new directory, so we don't have another one to consolidate.
> 

I'm fine with either way.

Thanks
Vladimir

> 	Arnd
> 
> 
>