[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2949036.dUgqHWXoSe@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:39:12 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>
Cc: linux@....linux.org.uk, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, mark.rutland@....com,
pawel.moll@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
galak@...eaurora.org, jslaby@...e.cz, robh+dt@...nel.org,
andy.shevchenko@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] ARM: mps2: introduce MPS2 platform
On Tuesday 16 February 2016 14:35:43 Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> On 16/02/16 10:56, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 February 2016 10:08:11 Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> >> The Cortex-M Prototyping System (or V2M-MPS2) is designed for
> >> prototyping and evaluation Cortex-M family of processors including the
> >> latest Cortex-M7
> >>
> >> It comes with a range of useful peripherals including 8MB single cycle
> >> SRAM, 16MB PSRAM, Ethernet, QSVGA touch screen panel, 4bit RGB VGA
> >> connector, Audio, SPI and GPIO.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++
> >> arch/arm/Makefile | 1 +
> >> arch/arm/mach-mps2/Makefile | 1 +
> >> arch/arm/mach-mps2/Makefile.boot | 3 +++
> >> arch/arm/mach-mps2/dtmachine.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >>
> >
> > We are in the (slow) process of consolidating the ARM reference platforms
> > (versatile, integrator, realview, vexpress) into one place.
> >
>
> Thanks for information! Sometime ago I saw on a list you had some
> thoughts on consolidating M-class platforms since most of them follow
> quite the same pattern (I'm looking at efm32 and stm32). So, shouldn't
> this platform consider that way?
>
Right, that would be another option. vf610 is in the same category as this
one I think, it's currently in mach-imx, and we can probably leave it there.
Unless someone is going to do the patch to consolidate the cortex-m
platforms, I'd stay with mach-vexpress here, but I don't have a strong
opinion.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists