[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160216161843.25aaac7046c7a79e1713c8a2@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:18:43 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
Cc: dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devm_memremap_release: fix memremap'd addr handling
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:30:27 -0700 Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com> wrote:
> The pmem driver calls devm_memremap() to map a persistent memory
> range. When the pmem driver is unloaded, this memremap'd range
> is not released.
>
> Fix devm_memremap_release() to handle a given memremap'd address
> properly.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/kernel/memremap.c
> +++ b/kernel/memremap.c
> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(memunmap);
>
> static void devm_memremap_release(struct device *dev, void *res)
> {
> - memunmap(res);
> + memunmap(*(void **)res);
> }
>
Huh. So what happens? memunmap() decides it isn't a vmalloc address
and we leak a vma?
I'll add a cc:stable to this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists