[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1455671761.2925.174.camel@hpe.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:16:01 -0700
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devm_memremap_release: fix memremap'd addr handling
On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 16:18 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:30:27 -0700 Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com> wrote:
>
> > The pmem driver calls devm_memremap() to map a persistent memory
> > range. When the pmem driver is unloaded, this memremap'd range
> > is not released.
> >
> > Fix devm_memremap_release() to handle a given memremap'd address
> > properly.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/kernel/memremap.c
> > +++ b/kernel/memremap.c
> > @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(memunmap);
> >
> > static void devm_memremap_release(struct device *dev, void *res)
> > {
> > - memunmap(res);
> > + memunmap(*(void **)res);
> > }
> >
>
> Huh. So what happens? memunmap() decides it isn't a vmalloc address
> and we leak a vma?
Yes, that's right.
> I'll add a cc:stable to this.
Agreed.
Thanks!
-Toshi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists