[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4j_TS3BXv0SyJzNg_FDdEB9uOmzTtibkS-Z_jAv_PDZiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:58:17 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Add x86 valid_phys_addr_range() for /dev/mem
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com> wrote:
> x86 does not define ARCH_HAS_VALID_PHYS_ADDR_RANGE, which
> leads /dev/mem to use the default valid_phys_addr_range()
> and valid_mmap_phys_addr_range() in drivers/char/mem.c.
>
> The default valid_phys_addr_range() allows any range lower
> than __pa(high_memory), which is the end of system RAM, and
> disallows any range higher than it.
>
> Persistent memory may be located at lower and/or higher
> address of __pa(high_memory) depending on their memory slots.
> When using crash(8) via /dev/mem for analyzing data in
> persistent memory, it can only access to the one lower than
> __pa(high_memory).
>
> Add x86 valid_phys_addr_range() and valid_mmap_phys_addr_range()
> to provide better checking:
> - Physical address range is valid when it is fully backed by
> IORESOURCE_MEM, regardless of __pa(high_memory).
> - Other ranges, including holes, are invalid.
>
> This also allows crash(8) to access persistent memory ranges
> via /dev/mem (with a minor change to remove high_memory check
> from crash itself).
If we're modifying crash(8) can't we also teach it to mmap /dev/pmemX
directly? With commit 90a545e98126 "restrict /dev/mem to idle io
memory ranges" /dev/mem should not have access to active pmem ranges.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists