[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <94D0CD8314A33A4D9D801C0FE68B40295BF96AF7@G4W3202.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 03:08:16 +0000
From: "Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)" <elliott@....com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@....mellanox.co.il>
CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"tom.leiming@...il.com" <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4] block: bio: introduce helpers to get the 1st and
last bvec
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-block-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-block-
> owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Ming Lei
> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 3:42 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] block: bio: introduce helpers to get the 1st and
> last bvec
...
> diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
...
> static inline void bio_get_last_bvec(struct bio *bio, struct bio_vec *bv)
> {
> - struct bvec_iter iter;
> + struct bvec_iter iter = bio->bi_iter;
> + int idx;
> +
> + bio_advance_iter(bio, &iter, iter.bi_size);
> +
> + WARN_ON(!iter.bi_idx && !iter.bi_bvec_done);
If this ever did trigger, I don't think you'd want it for every bio
with a problem. WARN_ONCE would be safer.
---
Robert Elliott, HPE Persistent Memory
Powered by blists - more mailing lists