lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:24:18 -0900
From:	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
To:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Cc:	Sagi Grimberg <sagig@....mellanox.co.il>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, tom.leiming@...il.com,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] block: bio: introduce helpers to get the 1st and
 last bvec

On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 05:42:12PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Cc Kent and Keith.
> 
> Follows another version which should be more efficient.
> Kent and Keith, I appreciate much if you may give a review on it.
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
> index 56d2db8..ef45fec 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bio.h
> @@ -278,11 +278,21 @@ static inline void bio_get_first_bvec(struct bio *bio, struct bio_vec *bv)
>   */
>  static inline void bio_get_last_bvec(struct bio *bio, struct bio_vec *bv)
>  {
> -	struct bvec_iter iter;
> +	struct bvec_iter iter = bio->bi_iter;
> +	int idx;
> +
> +	bio_advance_iter(bio, &iter, iter.bi_size);
> +
> +	WARN_ON(!iter.bi_idx && !iter.bi_bvec_done);
> +
> +	if (!iter.bi_bvec_done)
> +		idx = iter.bi_idx - 1;
> +	else	/* in the middle of bvec */
> +		idx = iter.bi_idx;
>  
> -	bio_for_each_segment(*bv, bio, iter)
> -		if (bv->bv_len == iter.bi_size)
> -			break;
> +	*bv = bio->bi_io_vec[idx];
> +	if (iter.bi_bvec_done)
> +		bv->bv_len = iter.bi_bvec_done;
>  }

It can't be done correctly without a loop.

The reason is that if the bio was split in the middle of a segment, bv->bv_len
on the last biovec will be larger than what's actually used by the bio (it's
being shared between the two splits!).

You have to iterate over all the biovecs so that you can see where
bi_iter->bi_size ends.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists