lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:06:22 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com> Cc: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, "linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>, Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com> Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] ARM: dts: Don't overheat the Odroid XU3-Lite on high load On 18-02-16, 10:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 18.02.2016 04:53, Anand Moon wrote: > > I also got lot's of error. > > > > root@...oidxu4l:~# cpu[ 3050.847663] cpu cpu4: Failed to find dev_opp: -19 > > [ 3171.640836] cpu cpu4: device_opp_debug_create_link: Failed to create link > > [ 3171.646197] cpu cpu4: _add_list_dev: Failed to register opp debugfs (-12) > > [ 3171.653574] cpu cpu7: device_opp_debug_create_link: Failed to create link > > [ 3171.659752] cpu cpu7: _add_list_dev: Failed to register opp debugfs (-12) > > [ 3171.697011] cpu cpu5: cpufreq_init: failed to get clk: -2 > > [ 3171.732505] cpu cpu6: cpufreq_init: failed to get clk: -2 > > [ 3171.768160] cpu cpu7: cpufreq_init: failed to get clk: -2 > > > > Tested on Odroid-XU4 > > > > Reviewed-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com> > > Tested-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com> What was this Tested-by supposed to mean? You got errors out there ... > The patch is not sufficient. It does not work the way it should... > > BTW, I found the issue. The order of trip points in DT: > thermal_zone0/trip_point_0_hyst:5000 > thermal_zone0/trip_point_0_temp:50000 > thermal_zone0/trip_point_0_type:active > thermal_zone0/trip_point_1_hyst:5000 > thermal_zone0/trip_point_1_temp:60000 > thermal_zone0/trip_point_1_type:active > thermal_zone0/trip_point_2_hyst:5000 > thermal_zone0/trip_point_2_temp:70000 > thermal_zone0/trip_point_2_type:active > thermal_zone0/trip_point_3_hyst:0 > thermal_zone0/trip_point_3_temp:120000 <---- this should be last one! > thermal_zone0/trip_point_3_type:critical > thermal_zone0/trip_point_4_hyst:5000 > thermal_zone0/trip_point_4_temp:90000 > thermal_zone0/trip_point_4_type:passive > thermal_zone0/trip_point_5_hyst:5000 > thermal_zone0/trip_point_5_temp:110000 > thermal_zone0/trip_point_5_type:passive > > After fixing the order in DT, the cpu cooler starts working. Ahh, nice. -- viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists