[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANAwSgTGod7kR0fWMZuCFG9oAnt6CrUXsQs=JWz4LtqWi5P8Tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:24:34 +0530
From: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] ARM: dts: Don't overheat the Odroid XU3-Lite on high load
Hi Viresh,
On 18 February 2016 at 08:06, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 18-02-16, 10:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 18.02.2016 04:53, Anand Moon wrote:
>> > I also got lot's of error.
>> >
>> > root@...oidxu4l:~# cpu[ 3050.847663] cpu cpu4: Failed to find dev_opp: -19
>> > [ 3171.640836] cpu cpu4: device_opp_debug_create_link: Failed to create link
>> > [ 3171.646197] cpu cpu4: _add_list_dev: Failed to register opp debugfs (-12)
>> > [ 3171.653574] cpu cpu7: device_opp_debug_create_link: Failed to create link
>> > [ 3171.659752] cpu cpu7: _add_list_dev: Failed to register opp debugfs (-12)
>> > [ 3171.697011] cpu cpu5: cpufreq_init: failed to get clk: -2
>> > [ 3171.732505] cpu cpu6: cpufreq_init: failed to get clk: -2
>> > [ 3171.768160] cpu cpu7: cpufreq_init: failed to get clk: -2
>> >
>> > Tested on Odroid-XU4
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
>> > Tested-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
>
> What was this Tested-by supposed to mean? You got errors out there ...
>
I had done some stress testing, as pointed by Krzysztof.
I got myself in two minds on this part, please don't consider the
Tested-by and Reviewed-by part.
Thanks for pointing out.
-Anand Moon
>> The patch is not sufficient. It does not work the way it should...
>>
>> BTW, I found the issue. The order of trip points in DT:
>> thermal_zone0/trip_point_0_hyst:5000
>> thermal_zone0/trip_point_0_temp:50000
>> thermal_zone0/trip_point_0_type:active
>> thermal_zone0/trip_point_1_hyst:5000
>> thermal_zone0/trip_point_1_temp:60000
>> thermal_zone0/trip_point_1_type:active
>> thermal_zone0/trip_point_2_hyst:5000
>> thermal_zone0/trip_point_2_temp:70000
>> thermal_zone0/trip_point_2_type:active
>> thermal_zone0/trip_point_3_hyst:0
>> thermal_zone0/trip_point_3_temp:120000 <---- this should be last one!
>> thermal_zone0/trip_point_3_type:critical
>> thermal_zone0/trip_point_4_hyst:5000
>> thermal_zone0/trip_point_4_temp:90000
>> thermal_zone0/trip_point_4_type:passive
>> thermal_zone0/trip_point_5_hyst:5000
>> thermal_zone0/trip_point_5_temp:110000
>> thermal_zone0/trip_point_5_type:passive
>>
>> After fixing the order in DT, the cpu cooler starts working.
>
> Ahh, nice.
>
> --
> viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists